Document parsing is a critical component in many enterprise workflows, from OCR to structured data extraction. This article provides a thorough comparison of three popular tools: xParse, PaddleOCR, and MinerU. It evaluates them across three layers: text extraction, layout analysis, and table recognition. The benchmarks reveal that xParse excels in accuracy for complex layouts, while PaddleOCR offers better speed for simple documents. MinerU provides a balanced trade-off. For engineers building document processing pipelines, this comparison offers actionable insights to choose the right tool based on specific requirements. The analysis is based on real-world testing and provides a clear framework for evaluation.
A detailed comparison of three document parsing tools, evaluating their accuracy, speed, and suitability for different use cases.